I read lots of book reviews, but rarely find reference to a topic which is of interest to me - value for money. I shop around for good prices on petrol, a new lawn-mower, a decent second-hand car, but it sometimes seems that book reviewers live on a different planet where the price and the publication values of a book are rarely mentioned (I suppose most reviewers get their books free of charge, so perhaps they think its a bit churlish to look a gift horse . . . etc, etc). Well, as "a common reader", I think the publishing industry needs to realise that the price/quality axis is not ignored by their market, and can be quite a significant factor in purchasing decisions.
I began to think about this post after reading a review of Tom Fort's Downstream: Across England in a Punt in The Oldie magazine in which the reviewer, Michael Leapman, criticises the production values of the book - "the publishers . . . too mean to add a section for pictures on proper paper, they have inserted them on the same pages as the text, all in black and off-white, many smudgy and several indecipherable".
Ahh, W G Sebald, what did you start? Of course, in Sebald's case the photographs were deliberately grainy and misleading. His black and white images strewn amidst the text of his prose books, without captions or credits, have the purpose of arresting time; to quote Sebald himself, "they act like barriers or weirs, which stem the flow, slowing down the speed of reading" (The Emergence of Memory by Lynne Sharon Schwartz). The photographs are an integral feature of Sebald's books and no doubt his publishers were quite bemused at having to print them among his discursive paragraphs (we bloggers can quite happily publish photographs of themselves aged 10 as here!).
Since then, a number of other publishers have cottoned on to the economic benefits of this type of book illustration and it has become quite common to publish photographs in this manner, rather than having a separate section of photographs printed on glossy paper.